« Trype Legal-art | Main | Providence Needs Resident Permit Parking! »
"Protecting the Innocent by Removing Graffiti"?
First of all, dubmn fuk, learn to spel, and then unnerstan tha we don use phoul language like dumbn fuck on this wevsite.
I doubt if you know anything about the history of graffiti let alone the history of art so for you to make a connection between the two is probably quite a stretch.
Of course here in Amerika, the liberals teach us that we must celebrate your ignorance, your inability to spell and just celebrate your willingness to express yourself. Well, here's a case of the . . . clap. . . . just for you. Congrats, you expressed yourself, D_F_.
Graffiti: South Wall, Mt. Hope Public Garden (JMT: Enhanced Digital Photograph
How so do you think graffiti is an art?
Why do you say:
"graffiti is a art and a strong culture"?
and
". . . the only reason why you hate it is because we are yung and you cant make mony off of it."
Do you have the facts, even a weak argument to back up that statement?
You must be referring to the hip-hop culture. Tell me, who's not making money off of that. Every multi-national corporation in the entertainment industry is making money off of the hip-hop culture: that culture was commercially co-opted from day one.
Expensive sneakers sold to poor people: cheap, baggy pants worn down below the waist: styles designed to make yourself ridicules.
They can sell you fools anything!
The bible says, "There's nothing new under the sun" and so it goes with graffiti. People with no power will always deface public and private property with their pathetic scribblings because they feel powerless to oppose the forces that control them. Some liberal, understanding, freethinking people of a Marxist bent will always romanticize these scribblings as art in an anthropological sense. A great New York Artist, Keith Haring, even cashed in on the trend and made a lot of money off of the romanticizing of graffiti, then he died of aids.
Not that there's anything wrong with that.
". . . you think you dumb fucks are protecting the innocent by removing graffiti?"
I have no idea what you mean by this. who do you think is thinking that they are protecting whom?
". . . the only reason why you hate it is because we are yung"
As the Chinese might say, that quote must cum from sum dum yung fuk because it just doesn't make any sense. Everybody knows that all the best graffiti is made by the old people who began the movement and who have the experience and the means to produce meaningful graffiti.
Shite! Young graffiti artists don't even know how to spell so how could they possibly make any quality graffiti?
But last of all, when you write:
.........WATCH YOUR BACK
I can tell you are too young to even have a drivers license, because you just don't make threats on the world wide web. Do you know how easy it is to trace an IP address back to your real name, and then what, your parents get indicted, is that what you want?
Just a rhetorical question.
You want to make art in the 21st century, kid? First of all learn to spell it, then learn what it is and why you want to make it, then check back in here. Otherwise, you'll be among the "stopidest".
In the meantime if you want to exhibit your great graffiti that you consider art, submit it here:
Make a Blog Entry
in the form of digital photos.
And BTW, why did you submit a comment about graffiti to a post about growing trees in Providence? Are you blog-illiterate?
Hey, we appreciate your contribution: you got more balls than most in this neighborhood that is rich with pathetic do-nothing back-biters who are willing to talk behind their neighbor's back but are too cowardly to put what they believe in out there in writing on this blog: but if you want to talk the talk here, then you got to back it up by walking the walk, meaning that you got to back up the words you write and be able to debate and defend them.
Posted at November 19, 2007 11:03 PM